Quantum Gravity and String Theory

   

Understanding Euclidean Quantum Mechanics and the Path Integral of Quantum Force Fields

Authors: Nigel B. Cook

Quantum mechanics, as historically formulated, rests on a mathematical shortcut introduced by Weyl in 1918. Weyl attempted to quantize the gravitational metric by replacing it with Euler’s complex phase exp(iX), a move later adopted by Schrödinger in 1926 to model atomic spectra. Although Weyl’s unification of electromagnetism and gravity was physically incorrect and rejected by Einstein, its mathematical residue, the use of complex configuration space and a single complex wavefunction, became entrenched in quantum mechanics. This groupthink formalism obscures the true dynamical mechanism of quantum phenomena. Feynman’s path integral formulation reveals the correct relativistic structure: quantum behaviour arises from multipath interference, not from a single complex wavefunction: quantum mechanics and quantum field theory can be formulated entirely in Euclidean spacetime using real interference kernels. Euclidean Schrödinger equation emerges as a coarse-grained approximation to the double-path interference dynamics. The hydrogen atom spectrum is derived within this framework, demonstrating full equivalence with standard quantum mechanics. This paper compiles key objective evidence for a scientific revolution, and proves precisely where the errors in mainstream orthodoxy lie, and the benefits of correcting them (rather than attempting to "explain" them using spurious epicycle type inventions such as superstring).

Comments: 48 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-07-23 22:56:52

Unique-IP document downloads: 0 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus