This study presents a resolution to the 2500-year-old Zeno’s paradox, restoring the relationship between Space and time to the fundamentals of classical understanding. Further, the calculation shows the instability of the relativistic space-time relationship in resolving the paradox.Zeno’s paradox has four main canonical variants, Dichotomy, Achilles and Tortoise, Arrow Paradox and Moving Rows. A comprehensive analysis is conducted of both classical and contemporary relativistic approaches proposed to resolve the paradox, including standard calculus, the summation of infinite series, models invoking quantised space, quantised time, and various adaptations within relativistic framework. Despite their theoretical sophistication, these approaches are mathematically argued to fall short of providing a satisfactory resolution.Coherent resolution emerges only under the hypothesis that time progresses as an independent, intrinsic and continuous entity, rather than being tied to spatial or kinematic variables. Classical mechanics tends to treat time as an independent parameter, but this feature has not been explicitly utilised in prior attempts to resolve Zeno’s paradox at a fundamental level. The present work proves where previous attempts, including the relativistic framework, fail and re-examines the paradox by explicitly enforcing the independence and the continuity of time as a primary principle, to consistently resolve the paradox.