| viXra.org > Relativity and Cosmology > 2005 |
 |
 |
| viXra.org > Relativity and Cosmology > 2005 |
|
|
[28] viXra:2005.0287 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-31 15:14:33
Authors: George R. Briggs
Comments: 2 Pages.
Abstract: The 7 "magic numbers" attributed to Eugene Wigner ended with the number 126 . How did he come up with this number so close to the mass of the Higgs boson at least 18 years before the Higgs was discovered?
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[27] viXra:2005.0262 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-27 15:52:30
Authors: Valeriy Kizka
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure; DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.16735.48804
The article discusses the possibility of detecting of gravitons using recently created devices with cold atoms at picokelvin temperatures.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[26] viXra:2005.0254 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-26 12:30:58
Authors: Zhi Cheng
Comments: 12 Pages. 1 Figure; Including Chinese Version
Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) is a device that uses the Askaryan effect to detect the interaction between high-energy particles and density matter. The Askaryan effect has been supported by sufficient experimental evidence, so the measurement results of the ANITA are very reliable. Currently, ANITA has acquired three important ultra-high-energy particle radiation events. The energy detected in all three events is extremely high, reaching an energy level of nearly 0.6EeV in the first two times, and exceeding 10EeV in the third time. These three events seem to exceed the explanatory power of the standard model. According to the standard model, the collision cross section of such ultra-high-energy particles will be relatively large, so it is easy to collide with rocks and other substances in the earth and cannot run across the earth. Here I try to use the theory of virtual space-time physics to explain. According to the theory of relativity, no particle can move faster than the speed of light. Because when accelerating, as the energy obtained by the particles becomes larger and larger, their motion mass will become larger and larger. However, from the knowledge of physics that we have learned now, the energy of any particle should not have a non-physical state such as infinity. Therefore, we can consider that when a particle gets more and more energy, it will encounter a critical point in a certain mass. This can be regarded as an upper limit of energy that the real physical world should possess. At this upper energy limit, if the particles continue to gain energy, their motion mass will not continue to increase, which will directly cause the particles to move faster than the speed of light. Another possible phenomenon is that the movement of ultra-high-energy particles causes the vacuum polarization to increase, which leads to an increase in vacuum dielectric constant, which in turn causes a decrease in the speed of light. However, if the velocity of the ultra-high-energy particles does not decrease at this time, the phenomenon that the particle running speed exceeds the speed of light may occur. According to the theory of virtual space-time physics, the speed of particles exceeds the speed of light, which means that the movement of particles enters the virtual space-time. This also means that in a certain space and time, particles with high enough energy may suddenly appear somewhere, such as appearing on the surface of the earth and then interacting with rocks or Antarctic ice on the earth to form the Askaryan effect. This should explain the three anomalous particle events detected by ANITA. This article also analyzes some other problems that may occur after the ultra-high-energy particles run faster than the speed of light.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[25] viXra:2005.0252 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-26 12:32:10
Authors: Genrih Leonidovich Arutyunov
Comments: 1 Page.
Emitting from a moving charge (oscillator), from the point of view of modern physics - Poincare’s Relativity Principle. (Russian language).
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[24] viXra:2005.0226 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-23 08:46:13
Authors: Zane Andrea Quintili
Comments: 3 Pages.
In this brief description we wish to bring to the attention a discussion on classical calculus to define the anomaly in the precession of Mercury found in the literature due to the difference between observations and Newton's gravitational theory.
We believe that the formulation and calculations proposed here are consistent with Newton's gravitational theory and that the famous 43" (second century arc) missing, emerge without using Albert Einstein's General Relativity.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[23] viXra:2005.0219 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-21 12:20:04
Authors: George R. Briggs
Comments: 1 Page. Today is my birthday, I am 96 years old
The "magic numbers" of Eugene Wigner include 28 and 82 and I have observed 0.82 to be an important ratio in MHCE8S theory.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[22] viXra:2005.0216 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-21 18:29:44
Authors: Eric Su
Comments: 2 Pages. Note that the author does not read Disqus comments here, please respond by email. Including a list of publications is also a healthy gesture
The total momentum of an isolated system is invariant if the system is subject to a conservative force.
An isolated system of
two identical objects subject to the gravitational force presents a rigorous proof that the mass of the object is
independent of the direction of its motion. In an inertial reference frame moving in the transverse direction to the
direction of gravitational force, the law of conservation of momentum requires the mass of an object to be independent of
its speed.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[21] viXra:2005.0213 [pdf] replaced on 2020-06-14 06:26:23
Authors: Ilija Barukčić
Comments: 28 Pages.
Aim: The possibility of the geometrization of the stress-energy-tensor and the problems associated with such an undertaking is reviewed again.
Methods: The usual tensor calculus rules were used.
Results: The stress-energy-tensor was geometrized. The stress-energy-tensor of the electromagnetic field was geometrized too. A method how to calculate the value of the anti-cosmological constant Lambda is developed.
Conclusion: Finally, Einstein's field equations are geometrized completely.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[20] viXra:2005.0183 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-17 16:36:43
Authors: Vladimir Netchitailo
Comments: 10 Pages.
This essay provides comparison of the Hypersphere World-Universe Model (WUM) with the prevailing Big Bang Model (BBM) of Standard Cosmology. The performed analysis of BBM shows that Four Pillars of the Standard Cosmology are model-dependent and not strong enough to support the model. The angular momentum problem is one of the most critical problem in BBM. Standard Cosmology cannot explain how Galaxies and Extra Solar systems obtained their substantial orbital and rotational angular momenta, and why the orbital momentum of Jupiter is considerably larger than the rotational momentum of the Sun. WUM is the only cosmological model in existence that is consistent with the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. To be consistent with this Fundamental Law, WUM discusses in detail the Beginning of the World. The Model introduces Dark Epoch (spanning from the Beginning of the World for 0.4 billion years) when only Dark Matter Particles (DMPs) existed, and Luminous Epoch (ever since for 13.8 billion years). Big Bang discussed in Standard Cosmology is, in our view, transition from Dark Epoch to Luminous Epoch due to Rotational Fission of Overspinning Dark Matter (DM) Supercluster’s Cores. WUM envisions Matter carried from the Universe into the World from the fourth spatial dimension by DMPs. Ordinary Matter is a byproduct of DM annihilation. WUM solves a number of physical problems in contemporary Cosmology and Astrophysics through DMPs and their interactions: Angular Momentum problem in birth and subsequent evolution of Galaxies and Extrasolar systems – how do they obtain it; Fermi Bubbles – two large structures in gamma-rays and X-rays above and below Galactic center; Diversity of Gravitationally-Rounded Objects in Solar system; some problems in Solar and Geophysics [1]. WUM reveals Inter-Connectivity of Primary Cosmological Parameters and calculates their values, which are in good agreement with the latest results of their measurements.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[19] viXra:2005.0173 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-17 06:43:13
Authors: Ilija Barukčić
Comments: 18 Pages. (C) Ilija Barukčić, 2020, Jever, Germany. All rights reserved.
Aim: The theoretical value of the cosmological constant Lambda and the problem associated with the same is reviewed again.
Methods: The stress-energy-tensor was geometrized
Results: Based on the geometrized stress-energy tensor, it was possible to calculate the exact value the cosmological constant.
Conclusion: The theoretical value of the cosmological constant Lambda can be calculated very precisely.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[18] viXra:2005.0172 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-15 21:08:42
Authors: Eric Su
Comments: 7 Pages. Note that the author does not read Disqus comments here, please respond by email. Including a list of publications is also a healthy gesture.
The velocity of a wave depends on the choice of reference frame. The relative motion between the rest frames of the wave
source, the observer, and the wave determines the apparent wavelength and apparent period in each rest frame.
The apparent period is different from the original period unless the wave source and the observer occupy the same rest frame.
The apparent wavelength is identical to the original wavelength unless the relative motion
between the wave source and the wave is non-inertial. The observed wavelength is identical to all observers.
A time varying wavelength is an indication that a remote star is in non-inertial motion during star birth.
The inertial force corresponding to the non-inertial relative motion between the rest frames
can not be identified as any fundamental force. A neutral object in the non-inertial motion is not attracted by electric force.
The massless microwave in the non-inertial reference frame is not attracted by gravitational force.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[17] viXra:2005.0165 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-15 11:50:35
Authors: Sangwha Yi
Comments: 4 Pages. Thank you for reading
In special relativity theory , we discovered 4 dimensional transformation of general
Rindler space time from 4 dimensional Lorentz transformation in inertial frames We try
to discover 4 dimensional inverse transformation of general Rindler space time.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[16] viXra:2005.0162 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-20 05:59:00
Authors: Jae-kwang Lee
Comments: 12 Pages. Some typos and titles were fixed at Version.2
This paper is a review of previous paper\cite{my:paper}, which is badly written and hard to read. There are three reason of writing this paper. First, Some results were presented immediately without an intermediate process. Second, when i recently read that even i cant find what i want to show. Third, some derivation was wrong.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[15] viXra:2005.0153 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-16 10:49:43
Authors: Richard M. Blaber
Comments: 14 Pages. Equation number 11 corrected.
If ‘absolute time’ is to be a meaningful concept, it must be measurable. Here, we set out to show how it may be measured, using both cosmic black hole thermodynamics and the Solar System’s absolute motion relative to the CMB.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[14] viXra:2005.0152 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-14 11:20:54
Authors: Alan M. Kadin
Comments: 5 Pages. Submitted to 2020 Gravity Research Foundation Essay Contest
Black holes were long predicted by general relativity, they have been observed in collapsed stars and galactic centers, and are universally accepted as real. But the orthodox GR equations were derived and tested for weak gravitational fields, and the extrapolations to large fields may not be valid. While the general evidence for compact gravitational objects is clear, the precision of the
observations of these objects is quite low. In particular, there is virtually no evidence for event horizons, the central feature of the orthodox theory. Some recent observations of black holes that have been widely promoted may reflect confirmation bias on noisy signals, rather than independent data analysis.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[13] viXra:2005.0151 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-14 11:35:15
Authors: Sangwha Yi
Comments: 3 Pages. Thank you for reading
In special relativity theory , we discover 4 dimensional transformation of general Rindler
space time from 4 dimensional Lorentz transformation in inertial frames.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[12] viXra:2005.0134 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-12 01:57:00
Authors: Henok Tadesse
Comments: 4 Pages.
In this paper we will briefly introduce Apparent Source Theory (AST ) as it is applied to the Michelson- Morley experiment and provide a link to animation of AST uploaded on Youtube. The animation will help understand not only why the Michelson-Morley should give a null result but also why small fringe shifts were observed in the Miller experiments, why the Miller’s absolute velocity direction differed from the directions determined by the Silvertooth experiment and the CMBR anisotropy experiment.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[11] viXra:2005.0125 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-11 00:52:44
Authors: Dongkui Tan
Comments: 8 Pages.
The special relativity (SR) is proposed based on the Lorentz transformation (LT) which points out the relationship between space and time. However, the LT intuitively assumes that the different dimensions in space are independent, i.e., the motion of a body in x-direction doesn't affect its position change in y-direction. By considering the correlation between spatial dimensions, a novel and elegant space-time transformation is deduced based on the principle of constant speed of light. The new transformation not only indicates traditional relativistic effects, but also reveals a new one, called as transverse dilatation. More importantly, the transformation suggests that the full universe could be a four-dimensional complex space-time with extra mirror universe. Subsequently, several fundamental and challenging physics problems are reasonably explained, such as the nature of electromagnetic waves, the spooky quantum entanglement, the ghostly dark matter(DM) and the center of black hole.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[10] viXra:2005.0123 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-11 04:28:17
Authors: Leo Vuyk
Comments: 20 Pages.
(Grace?)
Leo Vuyk,
Architect, Rotterdam,
the Netherlands.
Abstract,
According to Einstein’s relativity theory, the speed of light is supposed to be the same for
every observer in all reference frames.
However, there seem to be incidental differences in the lightspeed if we observe the outliers
of GPS satellite to CHAMP satellite distance measurements of 180m.
At the same time in the literature I found tiny structural but characteristic unexplained
irregularities in Planetary radar-pulse reflection measurements, made by I.I. Shapiro in
1964, between the Earth and Venus.
Both observations support the idea of the existence of ellipsoidal lightspeed extinction (or
vacuum adaptation) volumes around massive objects like the earth. Such a volume I will
call LASOF or Local Asymmetric Oscillating Vacuum Frame.
Other historic lightspeed experiments support the idea that all objects with mass are
equipped with some extinction volume.
As a consequence I propose new triangular trajectory lightspeed comparison experiments
between the earth and dual satellites or dual balloons and even in the laboratory to support
these lightspeed extinction and adaptation ideas.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[9] viXra:2005.0111 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-08 20:32:22
Authors: Milan D. Nešić
Comments: 8 Pages.
In 1905, Einstein was not able to explain his postulate c=const differently than only by symmetry. If a person moves an electrical conductor in the presence of a magnet, current will appear in the conductor. If the person moves the magnet now in the presence of the conductor, the current will again appear in the conductor - regardless of the fact that he homocentrically explains that it is once because of the electromotive force, another time because of the magnetomotive force, depending on what he holds in his hand. Yes, the unique electromagnetic force is transmitted at the same speed whether the magnet or conductor coordinate system is stationary. Equal and symmetrical. And precisely because of that equality, that is, mutual relativity, that Einstein’s explanation with the train and lightning on the railway embankment is not valid. Because of tacit homocentrism also the twin paradox is only a pseudo paradox, because of a misunderstanding of the postulate c=const.
The real explanation for c=const is c2 inertia, c2 as a measure of inertia, not mass. So can such an explanation open the way to understanding that deep connection ε0μ0m between electromagnetism and gravity, and finally perhaps make the graviton hypothesis redundant precisely because the inertial and gravitational masses are not only equal but identical—that is, if they really are?
I specifically summarize my five previous articles on viXra.org here with the intention of showing that the title of this article is appropriate: it suggests that Einstein’s theory of relativity should be understood via c2 inertia and not via assuming masses already realized, whereby the light speed c=const appears to us post factum only as kinematic quality.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[8] viXra:2005.0105 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-08 15:57:57
Authors: George R. Briggs
Comments: 1 Page.
Abstract: In MHCE8S modern universe theory the "magic numbers" of Eugene Wigner are mostly or almost the same.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[7] viXra:2005.0077 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-06 08:13:39
Authors: Robert E. Barry
Comments: 26 Pages.
Nineteen paradigms purporting to explain the origin and evolution of the universe are compared to observation. It is concluded that not one has presented unequivocal evidence relating cosmological distance to redshift or time from the so-called formation of the universe. There are fully formed galaxies at a distance of 10 billion light years indicating an age of at least 20 billion years for the universe and it is probably old enough so that its age is irrelevant.
The Big Bang theory, notwithstanding numerous fixes and arbitrarily chosen constants, has failed to predict the primordial abundance of elements and the large scale structure of the universe. It uses physics that have never been tested in any laboratory. The hypotheses of Dark Matter and Dark Energy appear to be artifacts of attempting to fit inappropriate models to the data. The supernovae data indicating acceleration of the expansion can be fit as well by a static model. Thus there is, as yet, no way to make a choice between an expanding universe and a static one.
Space is 3-dimensional. It is senseless to appeal to multiverses and branes which can never, in
principle, be observed.
Quasars exhibit intrinsic redshift and many (perhaps all) of them are local which accounts for their luminosity.
It is unlikely that the field of cosmology will advance in the foreseeable future given the
sociological forces arrayed against the resources required to develop alternative theories.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[6] viXra:2005.0067 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-06 16:05:31
Authors: Richard M. Blaber
Comments: 14 Pages. The revised version has minor corrections to the original.
This paper presents a brief historical overview of the developments that led Einstein to formulate the Special Theory of Relativity in 1905, and demonstrates how the later General Theory brought about the re-introduction of the concepts of absolute time and space the earlier theory had apparently abolished, examining the consequences for modern cosmology.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[5] viXra:2005.0060 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-05 12:12:22
Authors: Bandaru Ramu
Comments: 15 Pages.
Abstract:
This article reveals how some relative principles not obey its own principles. Practical examples given as experimental evidences which prove that:
Time dilation principle cannot calculate any time dilation. Relative velocity cannot cause any time intervals. Galilean relative principle depends upon relative velocity not time dilation.
Time dilation cannot keep Galilean relative principle.
Two postulates of relativity are not sufficient. What relative principle, what vacuum, the postulates cannot describe.
An practical experimental evidence reveals that light runs in inertial frames not in vacuum.
The main problem in Michelson Morley’s experiment is that they cannot recognise the difference between vacuum and inertial frame. the experiment were conducted many times but in only single inertial frame. If the experiment conducted between two inertial frames, the result follows relative velocity of the inertial frame not time dilation.
E= mc2 cannot keep any equilibrium between energy and mass.
Physical interaction or physical laws not taken place only in a single inertial frame but occupies among many inertial frames. When the interaction ( physical law) occupy among many inertial frames, which time of the inertial frames does the interaction or physical law follow?
What wrong in jet air craft - time dilation experiment? This follows relative theory? Was the Relative time observed by both observers: in jet air craft and another on the earth
surface?
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[4] viXra:2005.0056 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-04 17:25:42
Authors: George R. Briggs
Comments: 1 Page.
Abstract: I noted Eugene Wigner's magic number 82's strange appearance in my last note. His many contributions to physics are acknowledged (unfortunately too briefly) in this note.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[3] viXra:2005.0034 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-02 13:01:37
Authors: Sylwester Kornowski
Comments: 3 Pages.
We really need to change the basics of physics because we are approaching a dead end. Here we answered following questions: What is the nature of dark energy (DE)? Why it is very difficult to create the dark matter (DM) and DE structures in collisions of baryons? Why was the abundance of created DM and DE very high at the end of inflation?
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[2] viXra:2005.0006 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-12 01:13:41
Authors: Henok Tadesse
Comments: 8 Pages.
A paper by Simon WW Manley has claimed that the data from Miller’s ether drift experiments contains a component at the period of full rotation. Ether drift is expected to cause a component at half rotation because the Michelson interferometer is symmetrical on 1800 rotation and no component is expected at full rotation. The author concludes that “unless the advocates of ether-drift theories can provide a satisfactory explanation for the signal component with the period of a full rotation, that component is fatal for any contention that Miller’s heroic experiments were measuring meaningful physics.” We will reveal the origin of that fundamental component based on a new theory of absolute motion. The problem is rooted in the universal presumption that absolute motion is motion relative to the (non-existent) ether which predicts 1800 symmetry. Apparent Source Theory ( AST ) predicts that the Michelson interferometer is strictly symmetrical on full rotation, not on 1800 rotation. However, AST also predicts null fringe shifts for absolute velocities parallel and anti-parallel to the longitudinal axis and this may cause stronger second harmonic component.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[1] viXra:2005.0005 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-12 01:20:54
Authors: Henok Tadesse
Comments: 19 Pages.
Albert Einstein was right when he proposed the constancy of the speed of light regardless of motion of the source and motion of the observer. The constancy of the speed of light follows directly from the non-existence of the ether. However, Einstein's principle of relativity of space and time, which was derived from the light postulate and the principle of relativity, was wrong because: 1. it led to many paradoxes, and 2. absolute motion has been detected in other experiments. Special relativity was therefore a wrong interpretation of the light postulate. This paper provides a new insight that reveals the deep mystery underlying the many mutually contradicting light speed experiments. The new theory, known as Apparent Source Theory, states that the speed of light is constant and absolute motion exists at the same time. The speed of light is fundamentally constant relative to the observer but appears to be variable when measured. At the heart of Apparent Source Theory is the (one-way and two-way ) constancy of the speed of light regardless of motion of the source, motion of the observer, motion of the mirror, for uniform velocity or acceleration.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
| Third-Party Links: |
|