 |
 |
[3] viXra:2503.0091 [pdf] submitted on 2025-03-15 17:42:42
Authors: Jeremy Dunning-Davies
Comments: 4 Pages.
Here attention is drawn to possible problems arising from an inaccurate use of the English language in science. It is noted that such misuse may lead to incorrect public understanding of some common notions in science today.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[2] viXra:2503.0015 [pdf] submitted on 2025-03-03 20:14:52
Authors: Duje Bonacci
Comments: 13 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: AI assisted article is in general not acceptable)
Newton’s three laws of motion have been the foundation of classical mechanics for centuries. However, they were formulated within the framework of absolute space and time, assuming a privileged reference frame. This assumption becomes problematic when considering relativistic and quantum effects, which suggest that space and time are not absolute but instead emerge from deeper physical principles.Newtonian mechanics breaks down in two major regimes:u2022 At high velocities, where relativistic corrections become necessary,u2022 At small scales, where quantum mechanics takes over.In this paper, we demonstrate that Newtonian mechanics can be naturally extended to encompass both relativity and quantum mechanics by reformulating its axioms within the framework of genertial frames—a novel approach in which forces propagate at finite speed, and time and space are measured locally by material objects equipped with proper tickers.We identify the key flaw in Newtonian mechanics: the assumption of instantaneous signal propagation, both in force interactions and in defining absolute time. By replacing these with finite-speed force propagation and local time-keeping, we derive:u2022 Relativity as a necessary consequence of finite-speed force transmission,u2022 Quantum mechanics as a stability condition imposed by finite-speed internal interactions.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[1] viXra:2503.0002 [pdf] submitted on 2025-03-01 19:29:59
Authors: Tariq Khan
Comments: 5 Pages.
A short philosophical and speculative essay proposing that quantum mechanics (QM) and algorithmic information theory (AIT) are actually equivalent, or reciprocal, means or operations of describing nature. An understanding of this relationship could provide a means to solve complex problems via a formal correspondence between continuous mathematics and discrete mathematics. Subjective attributes are noted between the operations and compared for their similarities as a first step to motivate additional technical research toward a formal and fundamental theorem of the relationship.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
| Third-Party Links: |
|