Authors: Bert Morrien
Standard cosmological models face severe theoretical crises: the Vacuum Catastrophe, the Black Hole Information Paradox, and the unresolved nature of Dark Matter. These issues stem from a foundational misalignment—treating the observable universe as an isolated, expanding single-universe system while applying continuous, non-quantized geometry at black hole horizons. This paper introduces the framework of Reality (R) as an absolute, eternal, non-egocentric, and gravitationally closed thermodynamic system. By resolving Hawking’s semiclassical continuum approximation through strict Planck-scale boundary discretization (Δx≥l_P), black holes are re-evaluated not as information sinks, but as quantized thermodynamic pumps that compress high-entropy matter into net-zero entropy fluxes. Furthermore, by accounting for the unshielded gravitational influence of external cosmic zones within an infinite expanse, the ambient background tension naturally accounts for dark matter phenomena without invoking hypothetical particles. Finally, by treating the zero-point energy baseline (0" Kelvin" ) as an active thermodynamic floor rather than a localized non-extractable vacuum, mass-energy equivalence (E=mc^2) satisfies the baseline energy density of the cosmos. Through strict adherence to the Law of Non-Contradiction and Ockham's Razor, this model unifies general relativity and quantum field operations into a continuous, self-sustaining thermodynamic engine.
Comments: 15 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-09-25 19:09:14
Unique-IP document downloads: 0 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.