Authors: Jian Yang
Based on respect for the classical physical conclusion that matter-antimatter annihilation produces photons, this paper redefines the logical boundaries of fundamental concepts such as energy-anti-energy and matter-annihilating matter. Itstrictly distinguishes between two types of physical processes: first, the traditional mass-energy conversion process when matter and antimatter meet, which leaves behind energy and photons; second, the field-configuration-annihilation process proposed herein, which after interaction completely returns to the quantum vacuum ground state, leaving no observablephysical remnants. This paper introduces two hypothetical physical entities — matter-annihilating matter and electron-annihilating electron—and clarifies their symmetric annihilation relationship. Based on the philosophy of binaryopposition and unity, a theoretical framework of Chaos Theory is constructed, proposing three core foundational rules with mathematical expressions. On this basis, two major directions are outlined: experiments feasible with current technology and research directions verifiable with future technology. A set of falsifiable scientific predictions is also proposed. All theoretical inferences are ultimately judged by physical experiments, providing a theoretical reference forfundamental physics and new physics beyond the Standard Model.
Comments: 10 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-05-02 21:52:08
Unique-IP document downloads: 0 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.