Thermodynamics and Energy

   

Resolution-Shifted Identity and the Mechanics of Persistent Formation

Authors: Richie DeMott

This manuscript offers a cross-scale framework for persistent formation in which dissipation-enabled capture, functional boundary, and coarse-grained inheritance jointly explain how stable higher-order units emerge from prior-scale dynamics under differing local mechanisms. The framework is interpretive and organizational, grounded in established physics—nonequilibrium thermodynamics, coarse-graining, and effective description—rather than proposing new fundamental laws.A central contribution is a functional boundary criterion combined with the concept of resolution-shifted identity. The paper argues that boundary appearance is systematically observer-relative due to timescale separation: systems may appear sharply localized or effectively diffuse depending on whether their characteristic recurrence dynamics are resolvable within the observer’s temporal window. This is formalized through a causality-normalized participation ratio, β* = L/(cτ), used to compare recurrence-governed participation across atomic, planetary, and galactic domains without invoking a universal scaling law.The aim of the manuscript is to clarify how persistent structure can be understood consistently across domains while remaining fully compatible with thermodynamics and effective-field-theoretic reasoning.

Comments: 8 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-04-23 03:37:26

Unique-IP document downloads: 24 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus