[28] viXra:1306.0226 [pdf] replaced on 2013-07-01 12:22:20
Authors: Ioannis Hadjidakis
Comments: 9 Pages.
Humans perceive their environment by their senses. The sensitivities of the relevant organs differ for each person and so an individual profile of conceptual senses is formed. This difference of our “inputs” is another factor that deviates our reality according to our sensual organs’ ability. Finally, our conceptual reality is mainly related to the information that reaches us and which is dependent on our position in spacetime. The spacetime position of a physical entity is the data required in order to define any influence of the environment on it. The knowledge of the environment however is a prerequisite that can never be fulfilled. In addition to everything else, environment is also dependent on the entity under examination. This is why Universe reacts as an inseparable system and why reductionism (separable systems) is not the proper method for its study. In this essay we try to explain the findings we get by applying simple ideas to the Natural Coordination System (NCS) we have proposed for the examination of Nature.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[27] viXra:1306.0217 [pdf] submitted on 2013-06-26 08:40:16
Authors: Hu Chang-Wei
Comments: 12 Pages.
Relativistic and absolute space-time theories are two different space-time theories in nature.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[26] viXra:1306.0215 [pdf] submitted on 2013-06-26 08:47:49
Authors: Leo G. Sapogin, V. A. Dzhanibekov, Yu. A. Ryabov
Comments: 35 Pages.
The present article discuses the problems of new unitary quantum view of
the world in its applications to the different aspects of the reality. There are spectacular
examples of the new Unitary Quantum world view considered in the applications for
different aspects of reality.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[25] viXra:1306.0212 [pdf] replaced on 2015-01-02 17:12:38
Authors: Ernesto Lopez Gonzalez
Comments: 6 pages, in spanish
Background: In a previous work ("Matter as gravitational waves." 2012) it was set out that matter could be considered to be formed by gravitational pulsations in a hexadimensional space with anisotropic curvature, since solutions to Einstein's field equations presented many of the characteristics of a particle then. However no way that would allow the interaction between waves was provided. Results: It is shown that standing waves change propagation medium through three non-linear mechanisms: by changing the refractive index, deforming and dragging on propagation medium. Mechanical analogies of all these effects have been provided and later they have been related to Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics. As a demonstration of these ideas particle-pulse's acceleration is calculated for the "weak gravitational fields" case. The solution agrees with Newton's theory. Finally a new interpretation of Michelson-Morley experiment is provided.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[24] viXra:1306.0200 [pdf] submitted on 2013-06-24 10:37:58
Authors: Florentin Smarandache (Chief Editor), Fu Yuhua, Zhao Fengjuan (Vice-Chief Editors)
Comments: Pages.
This book includes 21 papers written by 23 authors and co-authors: Hua Di, Li Zifeng, Li Wen-Xiu, Shi Yong-Cheng, Xu Jianmin, Dong Jingfeng, Duan Zhongxiao, Fu Yuhua, Guo Kaizhe, Guo Chongwu, Guo Ying-Huan, Guo Zhen-Hua, Hu Chang-Wei, Jiang Chun-Xuan, Liu Taixiang, Tu Runsheng, Wu Fengming, Yang Shijia, Cao Shenglin, Leo G. Sapogin, V. A. Dzhanibekov, Yu. A. Ryabov, and Florentin Smarandache.
The editors hope that all these papers will contribute to the advance of scholarly research on several aspects of Special and General Relativity. This book is suitable for students and scholars interested in studies of physics.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[23] viXra:1306.0191 [pdf] submitted on 2013-06-22 05:56:41
Authors: Branislav Pavlovic
Comments: Book is in Serbian. 234 pages.Standard Copyright Licence
In this book I present the main results of my scientific work. My theory is based on the hypothesis of the existence of aether. In my work, I have devoted great attention not only to theoretical considerations but also to the explanation of experiments. I will mention just a few experiments (effects) which I have explained from the standpoint of my aether theory: the Michelson-Morley experiment, the Fizeau experiment, the aberration of light, the Ives-Stilwell experiment, the temperature dependent Pound-Rebka experiment, the Sagnac effect, and so on. Certain anomalies in the GPS system have been analyzed. The Pioneer anomaly has been analysed.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[22] viXra:1306.0185 [pdf] replaced on 2013-08-29 13:34:38
Authors: Radwan M. Kassir
Comments: 9 pages, 2 figs., PDFLaTeX―[v2-v3]: general editing―[v4]: revised eqs. p.7―[v5]: modified eq. (36)―[v6]: + (discussion notes) pp.6-7―[v7]: amended discussion pp. 2-3―[v8]: revised S. 3.1.1 & S. 4.0
This paper reveals the mathematical contradictory aspects of Einstein’s speed of light postulate and the Lorentz transformation (LT) equations. Essential analyses of the equations, leading to the intelligible refutation of the mathematical foundation of the Special Relativity Theory (SRT), are emphasized in an outlined structure.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[21] viXra:1306.0179 [pdf] submitted on 2013-06-21 04:16:58
Authors: Rodrigo de Abreu, Vasco Guerra
Comments: 22 Pages.
The traditional presentation of special relativity is made from a rupture with
previous ideas, such as the notion of absolute motion, emphasizing the antagonism of the Lorentz-Poincaré's views and Einstein's ideas.
However, a weaker formulation of the postulates allows to recover all the mathematical results from Einstein's special relativity and
reveals that both viewpoints are merely different
perspectives of one and the same theory. The apparent contradiction simply stems from different procedures for clock
"synchronization," associated with different choices of the coordinates
used to describe the physical world.
Even very fundamental claims, such as the constancy of the speed of light, relativity of simultaneity and relativity of time dilation,
are seen to be no more than a consequence of
a misleading language adopted in the description of the physical reality, which confuses clock rhythms with clock time readings.
Indeed, the latter depend on the "synchronization" adopted, whereas the former do not.
As such, these supposedly fundamental claims are not essential aspects of the theory, as reality is not altered by a mere change of coordinates.
The relation between the rhythms of clocks in relative motion is derived with generality. This relation, which is not the standard textbook expression,
markedly exposes the indeterminacy of special relativity, connected with the lack of knowledge of the value of the one-way speed of light.
Moreover, the theory does not collapse and remains valid if some day the one-way speed of light is truly measured and the
indeterminacy is removed. It is further shown that the slow transport method of "synchronization" cannot be seen as distinct
from Einstein's procedure.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[20] viXra:1306.0162 [pdf] replaced on 2013-06-26 04:56:20
Authors: Hans Detlef Hüttenbach
Comments: 4 Pages. Minor upgrade; no fixes
It is shown that the symmetry group of a neutral, energy and momentum conserving particle theory is isomorphic to $SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[19] viXra:1306.0139 [pdf] replaced on 2020-10-18 12:10:29
Authors: Antonio Leon
Comments: 7 Pages.
After a summary introduction to Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction, and a short revision of some classic and modern opinions on its real or apparent nature, this paper introduces two arguments proving that Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction can only be apparent. The first of them also proves the deformed appearance disagrees with certain physical laws, pointing to a breaking of Lorentz symmetry that questions the Principle of Relativity. Being also consequences of Lorentz transformation, time dilation and phase difference in synchronization could only be apparent deformations, which open the debate on the physical meaning of Lorentz transformation.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[18] viXra:1306.0121 [pdf] submitted on 2013-06-17 03:12:32
Authors: Eckhard Hitzer
Comments: 12 Pages. 3 figures. In K. Adhav (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Relativity 2005 (ICR2005), University of Amravati, India, January 2005, pp. 71-90 (2005).
This review of relativistic physics integrates the works of Hamilton, Grassmann, Maxwell,
Clifford, Einstein, Hestenes and lately the Cambridge (UK) Geometric Algebra Research
Group. We start with the geometric algebra of spacetime (STA). We show how frames and
trajectories are described and how Lorentz transformations acquire their fundamental rotor
form. Spacetime dynamics deals with spacetime rotors, which have invariant and frame
dependent splits. Spacetime rotor equations yield the proper acceleration (bivector) and the
Fermi (vector) derivative.
A first application is given with the relativistic STA formulation of the Lorentz force law,
leading to the description of spin precession in magnetic fields and Thomas precession. Now
the stage is ready for introducing the STA Maxwell equation, which combines all 4 equations
in one single STA equation. STA has procedures to extract from the electromagnetic field
strength bivector F, electric and magnetic fields (also for relative motion observers) and field
invariants, field momentum and stress-energy tensor. The Leonhard-Wiechert potential gives
the retarded field of a point charge.
In addition we formulate the Dirac equation in STA, both massless and massive. From the
Dirac equation we can derive STA expressions for Dirac observables. Plane wave states are
described with the help of rotor decomposition. Finally we briefly review a STA gauge theory
of gravity built on displacement and rotation gauge principles.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[17] viXra:1306.0105 [pdf] replaced on 2014-04-11 22:09:48
Authors: ChiYi Chen
Comments: 10 Pages.
In this paper we reconstruct the formulism of particle dynamics under the framework of classical mechanics according to the causal consistency principle, and obtain a new particle dynamical equation. In this derivation there is a most natural and simple assumption that an absolute background of space exists. Because in essence, the absolute background of space must be distinguished from the relative scales of space. The existence of an absolute background can not only be mostly compatible with the physical logic in special theory of relativity, but also retains the most fundamental elements in our intuitional experience. Certainly, the absolute background of space is also the underlying part of Newton's absolute view of space-time. In the application of the new dynamical equation, inertial reference frames are no longer required and inertial forces are no longer introduced by hand. This new dynamical equation can be directly applied in any reference frame which is irrotational with respect to the absolute background of space, namely a moderate general principle of relativity is realized on particle dynamics. The nature of the inertial force is nothing but the real forces exerted on the reference object. Further analysis illustrates that the new particle dynamical equation is more in line with the empirical laws of classical mechanics experiments, than the traditional theoretical formula of Newton's second law.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[16] viXra:1306.0104 [pdf] replaced on 2016-09-01 19:48:59
Authors: David Grant Taylor
Comments: Pages.
This paper formulates additional relativistic equations examining Einstein’s deductions from a Relativistically Distorted Perspective. The equations derived from a theoretic ideal “non-Relativistic” velocity distorted in the same manner as length, time, and mass – into an apparent “Relativistic” velocity. Absolute velocity is a necessary logic component for all Relativity equations – its actual determination is unimportant. Relativity physics equations presume ideals. The equations that are formulated here examine the absolute/real (no Special Relativistic Perspective Distortion, noSRPD) velocity and use it to determine the distorted (Special Relativistic Perspective Distortion, or SRPD) velocity. For an observer moving at a Relativistic Speed, some aspects of everything outside that traveller’s immediate environment would appear sped up. That would include the traveller’s movement through space: meaning an apparently higher Relativistic velocity.
Velocity |v| is one of the valid, theoretic ideals that Classic relativity (all of Physics) relies upon. Two equations developed in this paper show this relationship. Independent variables have no relativistic deformation [VnoSRPD||Time], the dependent variable is |Time’| because of relativistic deformation. Existence/non-existence of ideal values for absolute non-relativistic velocity values are not contested, they are indeterminate real ideals. Two examples of Relativistic Perspective equations are:
Time‘ = Time / (1 + vnoSRPD2/c2).5
This paper reasons an inverse relationship: when an independent variable is the observed velocity from the Relativistically Distorted viewpoints. The parallel equation from that Relativistic Perspective is:
Time‘ = Time / (1 + vnoSRPD2/c2).5
Time’ is the increase in Time units passing on an undistorted Clock, but observed from the distorted viewpoint. |Time| is what the value would be were there no distortion. The above relationship allows for the additional development of eight formulae/equations for the velocity, mass, time, and linear deformations.
Relativistic Perspective equations have been confirmed to be consistent with the Classic equations to 2000 significant digits for 37 velocity values ranging from 1.0E-500m/s to (c – (1.0E-500))m/s.
Keywords: Perspective, Physical Values, Relativistic Distortion, distorted Velocity, parallel relativistic equations, Time, Mass, Length, distortion, equation confirmation table
[15] viXra:1306.0103 [pdf] replaced on 2019-08-11 18:53:32
Authors: David Grant Taylor
Comments: 48 Pages.
This paper formulates additional General Relativistic [G.R.] equations. They do not contradict General Relativity. They examine the deductions of Dr. Einstein from a relativistically distorted perspective. The equations examine the distorted escape velocity of a G.R. object, determining its true – not relativistically distorted – escape velocity. In contrast to the variables in the Classical equations of Relativity, they are more specific in their aspect, and in their relationship to escape velocity, not simply the time distortion. The values for the quantities of rate (the Time and the Velocity) are the quantities for zero escape velocity||zero deformation. Because there are fewer seconds for a Relativistic Perspective that has distortion, the perspective equations have a different relation. They calculate higher velocity perceived by the observers in a General relativistically distorted body. The escape velocity would appear to increase in exactly same proportion as time – but the energy needed for that escape velocity would decrease because of the slowing of all Bosons – including the Graviton. The development of the equations is done more completely in this paper, but two examples show the principle. The classic Relativity equation reasoned to show the time distortion relationship is:
TimeRelavistic = TimeReal/(1 -
2GM/rc2).5
Because the escape velocity formula is [VelocityEscape = (2GM/r).5], then [VelocityEscape2 = 2GM/r]. So the above |Time| equation could also be expressed as:
TimeRelativistic = TimeReal/(1 -
VelocityEscape2/c2).5
That could be reasoned to mean that Escape velocity is limited to light speed, just as Real||non-Relativistic velocity is limited to |c|. Less time will go by when there is a relativistic deformation so all Bosons (including the Graviton) would lose their velocity/mass/energy. The inverse relation would be where the independent variables were the observed velocity from the Relativistic or distorted view. The dependent variable would be the True||non-relativistic||non-distorted Time||Escape_Velocity. The parallel equation for that Relativistic Perspective:
TimeReal = TimeRelativistic/(1 + RelativisticEscape_Velocity2/c2).5
This relationship allows the additional development of 2 formula/equations for the Escape velocity. There are a number of other equations for Mass and Radius that will be proposed in a following paper. These equations are all of the two Perspectives. All the equations are confirmed to two thousand decimal places for 35 different values to have a range of
|1.0E-500m/s|
to
|c-(1.0E-500)m/s|
without significant error.