[21] viXra:0910.0065 [pdf] submitted on 30 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 11 pages. Expected delivery time 2 hours , 30 minutes for the five referenced topics.
We present a lay out of five different, inter related themes encapsulated in
five articles which will be presented at Chongquing University, PRC, by Dr. Andrew
Beckwith as a guest of Prof Fangyu Li, of the Chongquing University Gravitational
physics group
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[20] viXra:0910.0061 [pdf] replaced on 17 Aug 2010
Authors: John A. Gowan
Comments: 4 pages, This paper has also been published as a Google "Knol".
Light traveling freely in space does not produce a gravitational field - contrary to most
"establishment" thinking. Because the "Interval" of light = zero, light has no specific location in
spacetime, and hence cannot provide a definite center for such a field. Since an uncentered
gravitational field violates energy (and symmetry) conservation (including the "Equivalence
Principle"), light moving freely in vacuum cannot and does not produce a gravitational field.
This result is important for theories attempting to unify gravity with the other forces.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[19] viXra:0910.0058 [pdf] replaced on 24 Oct 2010
Authors: John A. Gowan
Comments: 6 pages, This paper has also been published as a Google "Knol".
Gravity plays a double conservation role in nature, conserving both the spatial entropy drive of
light and the non-local distributional symmetry of light. In its entropy conservation role, gravity
converts the intrinsic motion of light to the intrinsic motion of time - via the annihilation of
space and the extraction of a metrically equivalent temporal residue. In its symmetry
conservation role, gravity converts bound to free energy in stars and via Hawking's "quantum
radiance" of black holes. These two conservation roles derive from the double gauge role of
"velocity c", which regulates both light's intrinsic motion (the entropy drive of free
electromagnetic energy), and light's non-local distributional symmetry (vanishing time and
distance). Conserving light's non-local energy state via "location" charge, gravity
simultaneously conserves light's entropy drive, since time itself is the active principle of
"location" charge. Hence gravity's entropy conservation role is by default brought under the
mantle of Noether's symmetry conservation theorem, revealing a pathway to the unification of
gravitation with the other forces of physics: all charges of matter are symmetry debts of light.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[18] viXra:0910.0057 [pdf] replaced on 30 Nov 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 32 pages, 3 figures [ part a and b of figure 3, which are of the same process ] (instead of four ). Re do of conclusion, plus some other changes after first version of this article rejected by American physics journal. Now sent to European physics journal.
Emphasis put upon , in conclusion an open inquiry as to how to use concept of entropy
as a way to add more structure to obtaining from a GW detector the normalized GW
'energy density' "function" which may have coupling of gravitons with E and M & other
stuff. Open question as to if Instanton-anti instanton representation of graviton as a way
to explain 10^ - 65 gram supposed deviation of graviton from usual zero rest mass in
zeroth order KK tower representation of KK gravitons introduced, as possible deviation from
correspondence principle. Possible role for t'Hoofts treatment of QM in his 2006 article about deterministic QM, as embedding background for QM.
In the 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, July 9th, 2009, the author raised the issue of whether early graviton
production could affect non-Gaussian contributions to DM density profiles. Non gaussianity of evolving
cosmological states is akin to asking if there is a way to get quantum contributions due to squeezed initial
vacuum states which act highly non classically. If particle counting algorithms in graviton production is
important as for entropy, and if entropy perturbations affects the density profile of dark matter clumping
profiles, then there is room to ask to what degree initial perturbations affecting structure formation are due
to classical/ non linear processes, or more quantum theoretic states. If squeezing of the initial vacuum
states is essential in the relic conditions, then quantization is unavoidable. If squeezing is not essential, then
coherent initial vacuum states may contribute in semi classical ways to GW production. The end result of
this stated inquiry may be answering if or not gravity in the onset of inflation is a quantized field. Or if a
highly non linear set of complex initial conditions for gravity can be stated using purely classical models,
as T'Hooft, Corda, and others believe.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[17] viXra:0910.0054 [pdf] submitted on 27 Oct 2009
Authors: H.-J. Hochecker
Comments: 12 pages, More details and the version in German language can be found on the authors web site (named inside the pdf)
It is clear that an electric field of moving charges is geometrically changed by this motion. A new
representation way of this change will be shown here. With the help of this representation the magnetic
effect can than be calculated directly from the geometric change in the electric field. The analysis of
different reference systems/frames (as in the special theory of relativity) is not necessary for doing this.
(The geometric changes, of course, still do arise from the special theory of relativity, however.) Finally,
through these observations, it may be noted that gravitation is also an effect of the translation of charges,
which can be represented mathematically here. So: under consideration of the special theory of relativity,
geometrical changes in the electric field caused by translation produce magnetism and gravitation.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[16] viXra:0910.0052 [pdf] replaced on 30 Nov 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 3 pages. no figures. Beginning of evolution and work on submission for the
12 Marcel Grossman conference by A. Beckwith for a written summary of the contribution
A. Beckwith gave in the July 17th meeting of the Paris Obervatory of the Dark Matter
parallel session run by Dr. Chardin, of France, in 2009
In the 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, July 17, 2009, the author raised the issue of whether early
graviton production could affect non-Gaussian contributions to DM density profiles. Non
gaussianity of evolving cosmological states is akin to asking if there is a way to get quantum
contributions due to squeezed initial vacuum states which act highly non classically. If particle
counting algorithms in graviton production is important as for entropy, and if entropy perturbations
affects the density profile of dark matter clumping profiles, then there is room to ask to what degree
initial perturbations affecting structure formation are due to classical/ non linear processes, or more
quantum theoretic states.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[15] viXra:0910.0050 [pdf] submitted on 27 Oct 2009
Authors: Ervin Goldfain
Comments: 5 pages, Published in "Hadron Models and Related New Energy Issues" InfoLearnQuest USA (2007), ISBN 978-1-59973-042-4
The cosmological constant problem continues to represent a major challenge for the theoretical physics and
cosmology. The main difficulty arises from the large numerical discrepancy between observational limits of
the cosmological constant and quantum predictions based on gravitational effects of the vacuum energy. In
this work we argue that the experimental value of this constant may be recovered from the dynamics of
neutrino oscillations.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[14] viXra:0910.0048 [pdf] submitted on 26 Oct 2009
Authors: T. De Mees
Comments: 5 pages
The quasar's redshift distribution is found to have a periodicities, according to K. G. Karlsson and others. Here, we
analyse if these peaks could be an indication of circling light about the centre of the universe. We find that the
Zwicky-Ashmore redshift theory provides an excellent evidence for circling light. We can confirm the age of the
universe and define its radius and its mass with a good approximation.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[13] viXra:0910.0038 [pdf] submitted on 20 Oct 2009
Authors: Xavier Terri Castañé
Comments: 6 pages, Spanish language
In this article is presented the formulas of the acceleration and speed
orbital according to three different theories: the gravitation of Newton, general relativity
of Einstein and, finally, the connected theory.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[12] viXra:0910.0033 [pdf] submitted on 19 Oct 2009
Authors: Xavier Terri Castañé
Comments: 7 pages, Spanish language
Einstein pone el conocido ejemplo de un observador A que, estando en reposo junto
a la vía del tren, observa dos rayos que caen en sendos extremos de la vía C y D.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[11] viXra:0910.0032 [pdf] submitted on 19 Oct 2009
Authors: Xavier Terri Castañé
Comments: 3 pages, Spanish language
La teoría de la relatividad de Albert Einstein se sustenta en las transformaciones de
Lorentz.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[10] viXra:0910.0030 [pdf] replaced on 23 Jan 2010
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 4 pages, no figures
The
consequence of abnormally low lithium abundance in a nearby population II star
(which is almost as old as the supposed population III stars) as represented by HE0107-5240
is that the standard BBN theory is out of sync with observations.
The analysis of the big bang
nucleosynthesis may help explain the anomalously low value of lithium abundance in the
star HE0107-5240, which by orthodox BBN, should not exist, as explained by Shigeyama
et al. (2003) [1]
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[9] viXra:0910.0028 [pdf] submitted on 17 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 2 pages, Rejected by ArXIV as unsuitable for their general physics arXIV section. Supposition
accepted as talk for ACGRG5, in Christchurch, New Zealand,December 2009, and a small part of the talk Beckwith
will give in Beyond the Standard Model, 2010 conference, South Africa
This thought experiment supposition will be raised in the ACGRG5, in Christchurch, New
Zealand, December 2009, as a way to start investigations as to being able to choose either LQG, or string
theory, as an initial space time template for emergent gravity . The author was exposed to Batisti's talk as
of the 12 Marcel Grossman conference, and intends to explore the applications of deformed Euclidian
space to questions as of the role of either string theory and/or LQG as to what degree the fundamental
constants of nature are preserved between different cosmological cycles, and also the degree that gravity is
an emergent field which is either partly/ largely classical, with extreme non linearity, or a far more quantum
phenomenon.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[8] viXra:0910.0027 [pdf] submitted on 16 Oct 2009
Authors: Mohd Abubakr
Comments: 16 Pages, Written in Hindi Language
Composition and nature of dark energy and dark matter remains one of the critical open
problems in modern cosmology. Several modified models within the framework of FLRW
cosmology have been proposed to explain dark energy and dark matter, however there has
been little progress. In this paper, we present a hypothesis on existence of discrete
energy bands accounting ordinary matter, dark matter and dark energy. Categorization of
forces into global and local forces, leads to classification of one energy bands. We
also explore the observational evidence to establish the existence of energy bands.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[7] viXra:0910.0020 [pdf] replaced on 5 Oct 2010
Authors: John A. Gowan
Comments: 10 pages, This article has also been published as a Google "KNOL"
Einstein's "Equivalence Principle" asserts that a gravitational field cannot be distinguished from
a suitably chosen accelerated reference frame - essentially because we cannot distinguish
between the reciprocal cases of spacetime accelerating through us (gravity), or our own
acceleration through spacetime (as in a rocket ship). Hence the equivalence between inertial and
gravitational mass - classically recognized by Newton as the equivalence between inertial
resistance and gravitational "weight", but not understood.
Co-movers with a gravitational field (in free fall or orbit) experience no "weight" - the field
apparently vanishes. This seminal observation allowed Einstein to equate gravitational and
inertial fields in his General Theory of Relativity. Because there is another way to "vanish" a
gravitational field, the possibility of extending Einstein's "Equivalence Principle" beyond
inertial force is raised. The conversion of bound to free energy (mass to light) in many
spontaneous astrophysical processes, such as stars (partially) and black holes (completely),
"vanishes" the gravitational field that had been associated with the converted mass. This
suggests a heuristic conceptual pathway for the unification of forces through Noether's
symmetry conservation theorem via the equivalence of all charges and forces (including gravity)
as symmetry debts of light: the charges of matter are the symmetry debts of light.
In this view gravity is seen as arising from a "location" charge which records the symmetry
debt carried by any immobile massive particle, the debt arising from the loss of the non-local
distributional symmetry of the light which created the particle or otherwise contributed to its
mass. The active principle of this "location" charge is time, whose intrinsic motion also
produces the historical entropy drive of matter. (See: "Symmetry Principles of the Unified Field
Theory: Part I"; "Symmetry Principles of the Unified Field Theory: Part II".) (See also: "The
Double Conservation Role of Gravitation: Entropy vs Symmetry".)
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[6] viXra:0910.0015 [pdf] replaced on 3 Oct 2009
Authors: John A. Gowan
Comments: 10 pages, This article has also been published as a Google "KNOL"
Gravity has two conservation roles in nature:
1) Conserving light's spatial entropy drive (light's intrinsic motion), which is accomplished by the
gravitational conversion of space to time (see: "The Conversion of Space to Time").
2) Conserving the non-local distributional symmetry of light's energy, which is accomplished by the
gravitational conversion of bound to free energy in stars (partially), and completely in Hawking's "quantum
radiance" of black holes (see: "Extending Einstein's "Equivalence Principle").
This double role is consequent upon Noether's Theorem and the double gauge role of "velocity c", which
simultaneously regulates the entropy drive of free energy (the intrinsic spatial motion of light), and the nonlocal
distributional symmetry of light's energy (vanishing time and the x spatial dimension). The entropy
conservation role operates at all gravitational energy levels, while the symmetry conservation role requires
an energetic threshold before nuclear fusion can begin.
Noether's Theorem requires the conservation of light's various symmetries: the charges of matter are the
symmetry debts of light. Charge conservation = symmetry conservation. All massive, immobile particles
(bound electromagnetic energy) bear a gravitational "location" charge which records the non-local
distributional, metric, and entropic symmetry debt of the freely moving light (free electromagnetic energy)
which created them. (See: "The Connection Between Gravitation, Time, Entropy, and Symmetry".)
At all energies, gravity pays the entropy-interest on the symmetry debt of matter by converting space to
time, thus providing an alternative entropic domain in which charge conservation can have historical
meaning. At high energy levels (as in stars), gravity also begins to pay the "principle" on matter's symmetry
debt, converting bound to free energy. The universal spatial expansion is reduced by the initial entropic
conversion, as space is converted to time; the original expansion is restored, however, when mass is
converted to light, reducing the total gravitational field energy and producing the impression of an
"accelerating" universe. "Dark energy" is therefore the reduction of the cosmic gravitational field by the
conversion of bound to free energy in stars or by any symmetry conservation/restoration process (which may
also be operating in "dark matter").
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[5] viXra:0910.0013 [pdf] submitted on 9 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 36 pages, 8 figures, one table.
The talk presents a first order approximation for a non SUSY presentation of not only
neutrino physics, but also DM, as a candidate having 400 or so MeV in value. Based in
part on a Lagrangian presented to the author by K.A. Meissner, and H. Nicolai,
"Neutrinos, Axions, and Conformal Symmetry", arXIV 0803.281 version 2, April 2nd 2008
(Presented at IDM 2008 in Parallel session, at the Alpha Nova center, Strockholm, Sweden)
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[4] viXra:0910.0011 [pdf] submitted on 8 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 14 pages Actual submission for the SPESIF 2010 conference, minus home address and phone
number. Adheres to the SPESIF conference formatting guide lines. Has three figures in it.
In this paper Beckwith asks if DM and gravitons could also impact the cosmic acceleration of the universe,
leading to an increase of acceleration one billion years ago, in a manner usually attributed to DE.
Following Marcio E. S. Alves, Oswaldo D. Miranda, Jose C. N. de Araujo, 2009 Beckwith will high light
what KK style gravitons, with a slightly different mass profile could mean in terms of his DM rocket
proposal brought up in both Christ Church, Dark 2009, and in SPESIF, 2009. I.e. value of up to 5 TeV,
as opposed to 400 GeV for DM, which may mean more convertible power for a dark matter ram jet. The
consequences are from assuming that axions are CDM, and KK gravitons are for WDM, then up to a point,
the density of warm dark matter candidates would dominate not only structure formation in early
universe formation , but would also influence the viability of the DM ram jet applications for
interstellar travel
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[3] viXra:0910.0010 [pdf] submitted on 8 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 11 pages. Actual submission for the SPESIF 2010 conference, minus home address and phone number.
Adheres to SPESIF 2010 conference formatting guidelines. No figures
We argue in this document that initial vacuum state values possibly responsible for GW
generation in relic conditions in the initial onset of inflation may have a temporary unsqueezed , possibly
even coherent initial value, which would permit in certain models classical coherent initial gravitational
wave states Furthermore, several arguments pro and con as to if or not initial relic GW should be high
frequency will be presented, with the reason given why earlier string models did NOT favor low frequency
relic GW from the big bang.. What is observed is that large higher dimensions above our 4 Dimensional
space time, if recipients of matter-energy from collapse and re birth of the universe are enough to insure
low relic GW. The existence of higher dimensions, in itself if the additional dimensions are small and
compact will have no capacity to lower the frequency limit values of relic GW, as predicted by
Giovannini, et.al. in 1995.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[2] viXra:0910.0002 [pdf] submitted on 1 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 38 pages, TNS ( triple nine society ) presentation as an invited speaker, in
Denver, Colorado, 2009. Has very advanced material with respect to non Gaussian contributions
to cosmological evolution put in, in last 27 slides.
In the first 11 pages, we present the simplest argument possible as to what is known and
not known as to higher dimensions, and how they fit in cosmology. The remaining 27 slides
are back up, to illustrate additional points which may come up in discussions.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[1] viXra:0910.0001 [pdf] submitted on 1 Oct 2009
Authors: Andrew Beckwith
Comments: 3 pages, prototype of information to be transferred to Erice School of Nucear physics,
in latex form before November 20, 2009 for Erice Nuclear physics 2009 conference, in "Progress in
Particle and Nuclear physics", special edition.
The consequences of abnormally low lithium abundance in a nearby population II star (which is almost
as old as the supposed population III stars) as represented by HE0107-5240 are that standard BBN
theory is out of sync with observations. Why such a low value for lithium problem in any stars as
due to stellar formation and gravitational perturbation on DM will be discussed. Neutrino-gravitational
wave interaction leads to a damping factor in intensity of relic GW of {1-5*(neutrino density/total
density) +.. }, as shown in CMBR data sets may be a solution.. Analysis the big bang nucleosynthesis
may help explain the anomalously low value of lithium abundance in the star HE0107-5240 which by
orthodox BBN should not exist, as explained by Shigeyama et al. 2003
Category: Relativity and Cosmology